Tags: Essays Comparing Islam And ChristianityBank Robbery Story EssayThe Elephant Man ThesisHelp Writing My DissertationWriting An Essay In Third PersonHow To Solve A Mixture ProblemBuilding Construction Business PlanWrite Essays For MeViolent Video Games Research PaperSocial Norms Violation Essay
Notice that the compare and contrast elements of your thesis, separated by "but," allow for this.
It is tempting to just provide summary for this type of paper, but analysis will show the importance of the comparisons and contrasts.
For instance, if you’re comparing two articles on the topic of the nursing shortage, help us understand what this will achieve.
He has taught English at the 6-12 level for more than 20 years.
He has written extensively in literary criticism, student writing syllabi and numerous classroom educational paradigms.
Rule utilitarianism and Kantian ethics share certain similarities and differences. Both rule utilitarianism and Kantian ethics emphasize rules, but they are also different. Confucian and Aristotelian ethics are more dissimilar than suggested by Chang Wejen in his paper Confucian Theories of Norms and Human Rights. Aristotles notion of harmonious functioning for the relationship between a ruler and his subject is fundamentally similar to Confucius notion of reciprocity.
1 is clearly the worst, as it is not at all informative.
The paper should contain an introduction with a thesis statement, a body where the comparisons and contrasts are discussed, and a conclusion.
contrast paper, both the similarities and differences should be discussed.
But the best compare and contrast theses go even a step further by showing how what appears to be a difference is really, at a deeper level of analysis, a similarity (or vice-versa).
For example: 5 While both Kantian ethics and Aristotelian ethics seem to emphasize individual conduct, the Kantian system is more applicable to matters of social policy. Despite the fundamental difference in how Kant and Aristotle ground morality, it is possible to derive a right to autonomy from both their ethical systems.