There are two basic schools of thought about how this came to pass. Read More → One of the assurances I keep hearing about the U. government's spying on American citizens is that it's only used in cases of terrorism.Terrorism is, of course, an extraordinary crime, and its horrific nature is supposed to justify permitting all sorts of excesses to prevent it.Tags: Solving Systems Word ProblemsEssay On Following Directions In SchoolLayout Of A Literature ReviewConstitution EssayEnglish Vocabulary EssaysEssay On Poverty And InequalityEssays Comparing Islam And ChristianityAutomobile Dealership Business PlanBlack Swan Green Essay
Read More → Leaks from the whistleblower Edward Snowden have catapulted the NSA into newspaper headlines and demonstrated that it has become one of the most powerful government agencies in the country.
From the secret court rulings that allow it to collect data on all Americans to its systematic subversion of the entire Internet as a surveillance platform, the NSA has amassed an enormous amount of power. It's a normal part of life, but we're increasingly unwilling to accept it at any level. The problem is that technological security measures aren't free.
They would have to be checked and put into the cargo hold. Read More → News that the Transportation Security Administration missed a whopping 95% of guns and bombs in recent airport security "red team" tests was justifiably shocking.
It's clear that we're not getting value for the $7 billion we're paying the TSA annually.
The Department of Homeland Security is rumored to be considering extending the current travel ban on large electronics for Middle Eastern flights to European ones as well.
The likely reaction of airlines will be to implement new traveler programs, effectively allowing wealthier and more frequent fliers to bring their computers with them.But there's another conclusion, inescapable and disturbing to many, but good news all around: We don't need billion worth of airport security.These results demonstrate that there isn't much risk of airplane terrorism, and we should ratchet security down to pre-9/11 levels.As with the Patriot Act after 9/11, the debate over whether these new laws are helpful will be minimal, but the effects on civil liberties could be large.Even though most people are skeptical about sacrificing personal freedoms for security, it's hard for politicians to say no to the FBI right now, and it's politically expedient to demand that something be done.It'd be easy to feel powerless and demand that our elected leaders do something—anything—to keep us safe. We need to be angry and empathize with the victims without being scared.Read More → A core, not side, effect of technology is its ability to magnify power and multiply force—for both attackers and defenders.If our leaders can't say no—and there's no reason to believe they can—there are two concepts that need to be part of any new counterterrorism laws, and investigative laws in general: transparency and accountability.Read More → The FBI and the CIA are being criticized for not keeping better track of Tamerlan Tsarnaev in the months before the Boston Marathon bombings.It's an old song by now, one we heard after the 9/11 attacks in 2001 and after the Underwear Bomber's failed attack in 2009.Read More → German translation As the details about the bombings in Boston unfold, it'd be easy to be scared.