Bystanders to a robbery in LA testified that the perpetrators were in a yellow car and the male was black and the female had blonde hair.
The prosecutor made up his own stats to make the numbers work for him.
I would never say the SATs and ACTs have no predictive value for anybody; they have predictive value for some people.
We just don’t find them reliable cross populations,” says Hiss. The SAT started in the 1930s as a scholarship test for Ivy League schools.
Former Dean of Admissions for Bates College William Hiss led the study which tracked the grades and graduation rates of students who submitted their test results against those who did not over several years.
Hiss’ data showed that there was a negligible difference in college performance between the two groups.At its heart the fallacy involves assuming that the prior probability of a random matching is equal to the probability that the defendant is innocent.choose from one of the topics listed below and critically analyse: The rules relating to bad character evidence under s.101(d) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 The admissibility of a complainant’s previous sexual history under s.41 YJCEA 1999.Biologists work to analyze DNA from body fluid stains and other biological tissues recovered from items of evidence, and comparing those to DNA collected from known individuals.Such analyses can associate victims and suspects with each other, with evidence items, or to a crime scene.In the newest edition of this frequently cited book, the authors continue their practice of organizing, explaining, and illustrating the law of evidence clearly, simply, and practically.Even though there was a more than likely probability, it is still not for sure.According to Hiss’ data, the test-optional policy could even help to level the playing field.“We need thousands of students going through higher ed.Such as “interracial couple in a car together: 1 in 1000.” Typically used by prosecution to argue for the guilt of a defendant during a trial.Although it is named after prosecutors it is not specific to them, and some variants of the fallacy can utilized by defense lawyers arguing for the innocence of their client.